🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be slashed by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that forced local governments to submit the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time building local support and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to end “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that chose to keep their wards.